Editorial Policy

At BonusFinder, our mission is to help you find safe, smart, and fun places to play, so you can get the most out of your time and money. Whether you’re new to the scene or a seasoned bonus hunter, we’ll help you find your perfect match.

Our Policy

Transparency is at the core of what we do. We show you how we review sites, who’s behind our ratings, and how BonusFinder makes money. So, you always know exactly what you’re getting.

Our team consists of online gaming pros who know the US market inside and out. Every review is hands-on, fact-checked, and designed to help you navigate promotions, games, and sites with total confidence.

Not every casino gets our seal of approval. In fact, many don’t make the cut. If a site isn’t fully licensed, fair, or fun, it doesn’t go live on BonusFinder US.

Principles

  • We fact-check every detail, so you’re always working with the full picture.
  • From sign-up to cash-out, we test the full player experience.
  • We use both hands-on testing and trusted third-party data to keep our reviews honest and helpful.

Independence

  • Player comes first – Our goal is to help you find trusted, high-quality places to play.
  • 100% independent reviews – Every review is written by our expert team without outside influence.
  • No paid rankings – We never let advertising or partnerships affect our content.
  • Transparent earnings – We may earn a commission if you click a link, but it doesn’t impact our ratings.
hero-cutout

Factors That Go Into Our Review Process

We take a close look at everything that makes an online casino great, good, just okay, or not worth your time. As industry experts, we know what to ask, what to test, and what US players expect from top-tier experience.

Every casino featured on BonusFinder US has gone through a detailed, hands-on review process. We don’t just scan the site – we sign up, claim the bonus, play games, and test the payout process ourselves.

We combine facts and first-hand experience to give you a clear, unbiased take on every operator we rate.

Before you place your trust in us, it’s important you know how we review the casinos we feature. There’s a lot that goes into it, but here’s what we focus on:

Bonuses & Promotions

Real Money Casinos

Bonus Type & Size

We measure how generous the welcome package is, including deposit matches, free spins, and no-deposit bonuses

  • Excellent: Strong deposit match plus a meaningful no-deposit or free spins.
  • Good: Solid deposit match plus free spins or a small no-deposit.
  • Average: Standard deposit match; free spins exist but are modest and require a deposit.
  • Weak: Small deposit match and/or free spins; no no-deposit.
  • Poor: Minimal welcome bonus or only free spins; no no-deposit.
Wagering Requirements

We check how fair the wagering requirements are. A wagering requirement is how many times you must bet the bonus before withdrawing winnings, the lower is better.

  • Excellent: 20× or less
  • Good: 25–35×
  • Average: 40–50×
  • Weak: 60–70×
  • Poor: Over 70×
Game Restrictions

We look at which games count toward clearing bonuses and how inclusive the rules are.

  • Excellent: Slots count fully, table games contribute meaningfully (≥10%), only niche exclusions.
  • Good: Slots count fully, some table/live games contribute, few popular titles excluded.
  • Average: Slots-only; several popular titles excluded.
  • Weak: Narrow eligible list; many top games excluded.
  • Poor: Very limited; most popular games excluded.
Bonus Validity

We measure how long you have to use the bonus before it expires. Longer timeframes are more player-friendly.

  • Excellent: 30+ days
  • Good: 14–29 days
  • Average: 7–13 days
  • Weak: 3–6 days
  • Poor: Less than 3 days
Ongoing Promos

We check what’s offered beyond the welcome bonus. How frequent, fair, and transparent the promotions are.

  • Excellent: Weekly offers with fair wagering (≤25×), regular tournaments/boosts/free spins/credits, clear terms.
  • Good: Consistent monthly cadence; mostly fair terms.
  • Average: Occasional promos; mixed fairness or unclear.
  • Weak: Rare or gimmicky, weak clarity.
  • Poor: Only the welcome bonus, nothing ongoing.
Loyalty Program

We evaluate the loyalty scheme. How easy it is to earn rewards, what the perks are, and whether rewards have real value.

  • Excellent: Clear earn/redeem, cashback or cash-equivalent perks, accessible tiers, no extra wagering on rewards.
  • Good: Mostly clear; decent cashback/benefits; mild gating.
  • Average: Exists but unclear or heavily point-based; real value only at higher tiers.
  • Weak: Opaque or cosmetic perks, slow earn.
  • Poor: Invitation-only or negligible value.

Sweepstakes Casinos

Bonus Type & Size

We evaluate how generous and transparent the welcome offer is, focusing on Sweeps Coins (redeemable for cash prizes) and Gold Coins (play-for-fun currency).

  • Excellent: Substantial SC given on sign-up or first purchase, plus a clear day-1–7 bonus calendar; no gimmicks.
  • Good: Strong SC + GC bundle; most players see meaningful SC in the first week.
  • Average: Mostly GC with a small SC drip; modest overall value.
  • Weak: Headline looks big but has little/no SC; real value delayed.
  • Poor: “Welcome” is GC-only or SC locked behind awkward conditions.
Ongoing Promos

We look at the frequency, reliability, and appeal of promotions offered beyond the initial welcome package.

  • Excellent: Daily check-ins, streak rewards, social drops, inbox promos, and a reliable weekly cadence.
  • Good: Near-daily freebies and weekly events; occasional streaks.
  • Average: A few promos each week, but calendar is inconsistent.
  • Weak: Infrequent and easy to miss.
  • Poor: Rare or one-off offers, mostly GC freebies.
Loyalty Program

We assess the value and accessibility of the loyalty program, including how easily players can progress and whether perks provide real SC value.

  • Excellent: Clear tiers and mission paths, with SC or cash-equivalent perks; most players can progress.
  • Good: Mostly clear; decent SC perks; mild gating.
  • Average: Unclear value or GC-heavy; SC perks only available at higher levels.
  • Weak: Heavily gated, vague milestones, perks mostly cosmetic.
  • Poor: Invitation-only or opaque; little to no SC value.

Trust & Licensing

We measure how strong and reliable the casino’s license is. Strong regulators mean better player protection, fairer play, and safer payments, while weaker offshore licenses offer less oversight.

Real Money Casinos

  • Excellent: Strong baseline with clear state license, geofence compliance, fair payouts, strong RG tools.
  • Good/Average: Licensed but mixed on conduct or payout clarity.
  • Weak/Poor: Disputes, compliance failures, or only minimum RG effort.

Sweepstakes Casinos

  • Good: Clear “no purchase necessary,” SC/GC distinction, consistent redemption, few complaints.
  • Average: Value mostly in GC, some confusion on SC use or redemption.
  • Weak/Poor: Opaque terms, promo complaints, unclear SC handling.

Game Options

Library Diversity

We measure how broad and up-to-date the overall game library is. A strong offering covers all major categories and adds new releases quickly.

  • Excellent: Very broad library across all game types; new releases arrive quickly.
  • Good: Strong overall library with only a minor gap.
  • Average: Solid but missing at least one major category or lacks depth.
  • Weak: Noticeably limited, few categories represented.
  • Poor: Minimal selection.

Progressive & Special Modes

We look at the availability of jackpot games and innovative play modes. More progressives and unique features signal stronger variety and appeal.

  • Excellent: Multiple major progressives plus modern special modes.
  • Good: Some progressives with several special modes.
  • Average: Few progressives or only basic modes.
  • Weak: Rare progressives, little innovation.
  • Poor: No progressives or special modes at all.

Top-Tier Providers

We evaluate the quality of game studios represented in the catalog. Having well-known providers alongside mid-size and indie studios ensures trust and variety.

  • Excellent: Many leading studios plus a mix of mid-size/indie providers.
  • Good: Most top studios present.
  • Average: Mixed catalog with notable gaps in big-name providers.
  • Weak: Only a few recognized providers.
  • Poor: Mostly unknown or in-house only.

Live Casino Diversity

We assess the depth of live dealer content. A strong live casino includes table staples, game shows, and flexible stake levels.

  • Excellent: Full spread of table games, game shows, and multiple stake levels.
  • Good: Broad core set with some variants.
  • Average: Core games only with limited variants and limits.
  • Weak: Very small live casino offering.
  • Poor: No live casino.

Game Info & Transparency

We check how clearly game information is displayed, including RTP (return-to-player) stats and rules. Easy access to accurate info improves fairness and trust.

  • Excellent: RTP and key stats shown directly in-lobby, plus clear rules.
  • Good: Full info available with one click.
  • Average: Partial or inconsistent information.
  • Weak: Sparse info; often requires external search.
  • Poor: No meaningful info provided.

Payments & Withdrawals

Real Money Casinos

Deposits & Withdrawals Coverage

We check how many payment methods are supported for deposits and withdrawals, and how reliable they are.

  • Excellent: Wide range of local and global methods, high acceptance, fast e-wallets/instant bank, no “deposit-only” traps.
  • Good: Strong coverage but a few gaps (missing popular method, some deposit-only options).
  • Average: Standard set with noticeable gaps; limited withdrawal options.
  • Weak: Few reliable methods, often just slow bank wires.
  • Poor: One or two unreliable options only.
Speed & Transparency

We evaluate how fast payouts are processed and how clearly the casino communicates timelines. Transparency reduces uncertainty and complaints.

  • Excellent: Payouts within 24–48h (including weekends), clear timings per method, consistent record.
  • Good: Usually 1–2 business days, mostly clear info, rare issues.
  • Average: 2–4 days, occasional pending delays, fragmented info.
  • Weak: 4–7 days, frequent delays, vague or hidden info.
  • Poor: Over a week or repeated holds, misleading info, high complaints.

Sweepstakes Casinos

Redemption Access

We look at how easy it is to redeem Sweeps Coins, including minimum thresholds, caps, and purchase options.

  • Excellent: Low minimum, generous caps, broad purchase options.
  • Good: Moderate minimums and caps, good banking coverage with minor gaps.
  • Average: Higher minimums or tighter caps; standard banking set.
  • Weak: High minimums with low caps; limited or unreliable banking rails.
  • Poor: Very high minimums, severe caps, very limited or failing banking options.
Redemption Speed & Transparency

We measure how quickly SC redemptions are processed and how clearly rules are presented. Clear timelines and instructions reduce friction.

  • Excellent: Payouts within 48h, clear “how to redeem” instructions, thresholds/caps listed per method, consistent record.
  • Good: 2–5 days, mostly clear info, rare inconsistencies.
  • Average: 5–7 days, info findable but dense, occasional mismatches.
  • Weak: 7–10 days, vague or hidden details, frequent delays or shifting rules.
  • Poor: Over 10 days, inconsistent delivery, misleading/conflicting information.

User Experience

Performance & Navigation

We test how fast and stable the platform runs, and how easy it is to find games or promotions. Smooth loading, stable play, and clear navigation are key.

  • Excellent: Lightning-fast loads (<5s), stable play with no crashes, smooth resume. Clear categories, strong search, and filters that make games and promos easy to find.
  • Good: Mostly smooth, with only minor hiccups (5–8s loads or small glitches). Good search/filters; promos within one click.
  • Average: Occasional lag, spinners, or timeouts. Basic search/filters; promos scattered.
  • Weak: Frequent lag/freezes, periodic crashes. Hard to find games/promos; poor categorization.
  • Poor: Regular crashes, long stalls, broken structure where users must hunt.

In-Game & Mobile Experience

We look at how well games run once launched and how polished the mobile experience is. Stable gameplay and responsive design ensure accessibility across devices.

  • Excellent: Stable fullscreen play, quick panel, remembers past games, smooth portrait/landscape, consistent lobby return. Mobile layouts responsive with large touch targets, sticky nav, strong PWA/native app, biometric login, seamless resume.
  • Good: Solid overall, just minor quirks or a few cramped screens.
  • Average: Occasional layout issues, slow restore, or viewport jumps. Usable but cramped.
  • Weak: Frequent glitches, unresponsive controls, desktop-first design needing pinch-zoom.
  • Poor: Broken scaling, unreliable controls, many flows unusable on mobile.

Customer Support

Availability & Access

We check how easy it is to reach human support, what channels are available, and whether local language coverage exists.

  • Excellent: 24/7 live chat plus email (phone optional), fast human handoff from bot, local languages covered, clear hours.
  • Good: Extended live chat (16–20h) plus email, decent language coverage.
  • Average: Limited-hours chat or email-only but responsive; English-only in non-English markets.
  • Weak: Email/webform only, slow live chat hours, poor language fit.
  • Poor: No reliable human support channel or routinely unavailable.

Speed & Transparency

We test how fast issues are resolved and how clearly the process is communicated through FAQs, help centers, or ticketing systems.

  • Excellent: Chat replies within 1 minute, email within 2 hours, many cases resolved at first contact, clear ETA and ticket tracking. Help center is searchable, localized, and includes promo/SC redemption info, with incident/status page.
  • Good: Chat replies 1–3 minutes, email same day, simple cases resolved quickly. FAQ coverage strong and linked to promos.
  • Average: Chat replies 3–5 minutes, email within 24h, multiple touches needed. Basic FAQs with scattered promo help, limited localization.
  • Weak: Chat 5–10 minutes, email 24–48h, frequent escalations. Sparse or outdated articles, unclear processes.
  • Poor: Chat >10 minutes or frequent timeouts, email >48–72h, unresolved loops. No meaningful help center or hidden rules.

Editorial Independence & Trust Standards

At BonusFinder, we believe trust is everything, especially when real money is involved. That’s why our casino reviews, rankings, and recommendations are based entirely on firsthand testing, industry expertise, and strict internal standards. We never let commercial partnerships or paid placements influence what we say, and we’re proud to stand behind every review we publish.

Here’s how we keep things honest and player-first:

  • We only list casinos that are licensed by a U.S. state regulator or operate legally as a social casino.
  • Every review is based on real testing. We sign up, deposit, claim the bonus, and play just like you would.
  • Our editorial process is completely separate from our commercial relationships. Rankings can’t be bought.
  • If an operator doesn’t meet our standards for safety, fairness, and player protection, they don’t get listed.
  • Our team brings years of experience in the gambling space and uses that knowledge to evaluate casinos with expert-level insight.
  • We do the work so you can make smarter, safer decisions, and find more fun with fewer surprises.

How We Maintain Trust Standards

  • We promote responsible gambling and only recommend casinos that support safe, controlled play.
  • We stay neutral and unbiased. Our ratings are based on real testing and what’s best for you, not what’s best for the casino.
  • Our editorial team actively tracks changes in the U.S. gambling market to keep all content accurate and up to date.
  • We stand for transparency in everything we publish, no hidden agendas, no paid rankings, no fluff.
  • BonusFinder was built to help players make informed decisions based on facts, not marketing spin.

Fact-Checking & Correction Process

Accuracy isn’t optional. It’s the foundation of everything we publish. Whether you’re reading a casino review, a bonus guide, or a how-to article, you can count on the information being fact-checked, expert-led, and up to date. We want you to feel confident that what you’re reading is not only helpful, but correct.

Here’s how we make sure every detail is verified:

  • All of our content is researched and written by gambling industry experts with deep knowledge of U.S. casino markets, betting platforms, and gaming regulations.
  • Each article is reviewed by our dedicated fact-checker, Luciano Passavanti, who verifies licensing, bonus terms, game availability, and T&Cs.
  • We cross-reference information from multiple sources, including official casino websites, state regulatory agencies, and real player feedback.
  • We regularly audit and update our reviews to reflect current offerings, new promotions, or policy changes, no outdated info here.

Ongoing Content Reviews & Updates

At BonusFinder, we regularly update our reviews and articles to reflect the latest U.S. bonuses, promos, and regulatory changes. If an operator updates its terms, we adjust our content to match.

If you spot outdated info, let us know via our contact form or by emailing [email protected]. We’ll review and correct it quickly to keep everything accurate.

Meet Our Team

BonusFinder is run by a team of gambling experts with deep industry experience. Every member of the team has either worked as a professional gambler or directly with casinos and sportsbooks.

We handle everything in-house, from testing bonuses and reviewing operators to running the site itself. We’ve even worked with U.S. state regulators on licensing and compliance, so you can trust that we know what matters when it comes to safe, legal, and fun online play.

Author Lucy Wynne

Lucy Wynne - Senior Gambling News Editor

Lucy is the mastermind behind our BonusFinder news desk. Lucy has years of experience in the gambling journalism scene, and brings the latest scoops from the American gambling market to our readers.

Fact Checker Luciano Passavanti

Luciano Passavanti - VP of BonusFinder

As the VP of BonusFinder, Luciano leverages his extensive experience in online gambling to ensure that the platform's content is user friendly and meets high-quality standards.

Our Use of AI & Data-Driven Insights

At BonusFinder, we combine the power of advanced AI tools with real-world gambling expertise to deliver smarter, faster, and more accurate insights. While we use AI to support research and spot trends, every review, article, and recommendation is still written by our expert team, because nothing replaces firsthand experience.

How We Use AI in Our Research

  • Trend Discovery – We use tools like ChatGPT and Grok to track bonus trends, player preferences, and industry shifts so our content stays timely and relevant.
  • Data Analysis – We analyze RTP rates, bonus structures, and player reviews with AI-powered data tools — making it easier for you to find more fun, without sifting through clutter.
  • Regulatory Monitoring – We monitor state-by-state gambling regulations using AI, helping us keep up with legal changes across the U.S.
  • Research Automation – We streamline the tedious stuff, like pulling licensing info, bonus terms, and game specs — so you spend less time searching and more time having a great time.

What AI Does Not Do

While we use AI tools to support our research, we never use AI to write our reviews, rankings, or casino recommendations. Everything you read on BonusFinder is written by real experts, not generated by a bot.

Our team includes professional gamblers, industry analysts, and experienced writers who’ve spent years working with online casinos and sportsbooks. Every piece of content is based on real testing, personal insight, and hands-on experience, from claiming bonuses to testing withdrawals to checking how games actually play.

We believe the player experience comes first. And no AI can replace what we learn from playing, reviewing, and evaluating casinos the way real players do.

Data-Driven Decision Making

We rely on real data, not opinions, to build fair, transparent reviews that help U.S. players play smarter.

  • Bonus Value Breakdown – We calculate bonuses using real math, so you know the true value before you play.
  • User Experience Tracking – We collect feedback, monitor support speed, and test payouts to show where real players get treated right.
  • Game Quality Testing – We analyze RTP, volatility, and provider reputation to highlight high-quality games — not just long lists.

How We Earn Money

BonusFinder US is a free, independent casino comparison site. We partner with licensed U.S. operators through affiliate links, which means we may earn a commission if you sign up and claim a bonus through one of our links. It never costs you anything extra.

How Affiliate Partnerships Work

  • We only partner with licensed and regulated U.S. casinos that meet our editorial standards.
  • Our reviews and rankings are based on real testing — never influenced by payments or partnerships.
  • Affiliate commissions allow us to publish expert reviews, bonus breakdowns, and responsible gambling resources, all 100% free to you.

Commitment to Transparency & Player Trust

At BonusFinder, everything we publish is designed to help you make informed, confident choices. We don’t just review casinos — we hold them to a high standard. Our goal is simple: give players the facts, without the fluff.

Here’s how we keep it honest:

  • Editorial independence – All content is written and fact-checked by gambling industry pros who focus on what matters to players — not what benefits the casinos.
  • Unbiased bonus analysis – We break down bonus value using real data, so you know exactly what you’re getting before you sign up.
  • Player-first approach – We prioritize your gaming experience by delivering accurate, up-to-date information on the sites we recommend.

We don’t sell rankings or cut corners, just clear, honest reviews built to help you play smarter.

Contact Us

If you have questions about our editorial standards or spot something that needs correcting, get in touch anytime. You can reach us through our contact us form or send an email to [email protected]

Last updated: